Interview Practice And Its Importance At The USPTO

Author

Picture of Craige Thompson

Craige Thompson

Craige is an experienced engineer, accomplished patent attorney, and bestselling author.

Table of contents

Share

✎Executive Summary2 min read
Key Takeaways
  • USPTO data showed applications with at least one examiner interview had an allowance rate 10% higher than applications with no interview.
  • The share of applications with at least one interview rose from 19.6% at the start of fiscal year 2010 to an all-time high of 38.1% by the end of fiscal year 2020.
  • The USPTO has added tools to support interviews, including automated web-based interview requests, Technology Center Interview Specialists, video conference interviews, and public interview rooms at USPTO offices.
  • By contrast, the Full First Action Interview Pilot Program, which paired a pre-first-office-action interview with modified prosecution procedures, was used in only about 0.2% of eligible applications over its 12-year existence.
  • Due to that limited use, the USPTO announced the Full First Action Interview Pilot Program would be discontinued effective January 15, 2021.
The Bottom Line: Requesting an examiner interview during prosecution is a proven, increasingly popular tool associated with a meaningfully higher allowance rate, even as a related but little-used pilot program (the Full First Action Interview Pilot) was being phased out.

By Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary Of Commerce For Intellectual Property And Director Of The United States Patent And Trademark Office

First Action Interview Pilot Program to end on January 15, 2021

Whether initiated by the applicant or the examiner, interviews during patent prosecution provide an opportunity for the participants to discuss the merits of an application and gain insights that are sometimes not apparent through written exchanges. Examiners are available for telephonic or video interviews, with video interviews gaining in popularity.

The USPTO’s improved information technology infrastructure is now permitting high-quality virtual interactions that far exceed past experiences.

Interviews can lead to a better understanding of an applicant’s invention, bridge gaps between the examiner and applicant, and serve as an effective mechanism for facilitating agreement and furthering prosecution.

Recent data shows that applications with at least one interview had an allowance rate 10% higher than those with no interview, demonstrating that interviews are an effective tool to place claims in a condition for allowance.

This statistic is especially meaningful, as interviews most commonly occur when rejections or objections are pending and the path to allowability is not immediately clear.

As a result of the USPTO’s efforts to promote interview practice at all stages of prosecution, the percentage of applications having at least one interview is now at an all-time high, having risen from 19.6% at the beginning of FY 2010 to 38.1% at the end of FY 2020.

To maintain steady progress in this area, we are constantly monitoring and refining our programs. Over time, the USPTO has introduced a number of successful enhancements to facilitate interviews, including: Automated Interview Requests, a convenient web-based method to request an interview; Technology Center Interview Specialists, subject matter experts on interview practice and policy; video conference interviews, allowing an examiner and an applicant to interact in real time from anywhere using video and document sharing; and public interview rooms, available at each USPTO office (when our physical premises reopen).

On the other hand, the Full First Action Interview Pilot Program has not been as successful. The program couples an interview before a first office action on the merits at the request of the applicant with modified prosecution procedures. During the 12 years of the program’s existence, it has been used for only approximately 0.2% of eligible applications.

Due to its limited use, the program will be discontinued effective January 15, 2021. This will allow us to concentrate on more effective actions.

Complimentary Patent Needs Assessment

related articles

Profit from Patent

Client Success Story: Mario Soave From Doubt to Dollars

✎Executive Summary2 min read Key Takeaways Thompson Patent Law client Mario Soave pitched his company CleverFi on

Profit from Patent

Client Success Story: Meadow Setting A New Standard For Refillable Products

✎Executive Summary1 min read Key Takeaways Thompson Patent Law client Meadow developed patented packaging technology that repurposes

Thompson Patent Law ranked #39 in US Utility Patent Top 40.

Thompson Patent Law: A Leader in Innovation

✎Executive Summary2 min read Key Takeaways Thompson Patent Law was ranked 39th on the 2023 US Utility