LQP PatentCast: Intellectual Ventures V. Motorola Mobility

Author

Picture of Craige Thompson

Craige Thompson

Craige is an experienced engineer, accomplished patent attorney, and bestselling author.

Table of contents

Share

[team_post_link]
Person typing on smartphone with messaging app open.
✎Executive Summary1 min read
Key Takeaways
  • Intellectual Ventures missed out on a huge potential win over technology that could have covered SMS text messaging because a claim went one step too far.
  • Craige identifies specific litigation and patent drafting mistakes made by both Intellectual Ventures and Motorola in this dispute.
  • He explains what each side could have done differently to change or improve the outcome.
  • Notably, simply characterizing prior art negatively in the patent can unintentionally narrow the claim’s scope, even without directly saying so.
The Bottom Line: How you characterize prior art in a patent application, even in passing, can inadvertently narrow your claim scope, so drafting choices deserve careful scrutiny before filing.

Summary: Intellectual ventures patent misses a huge potential win because the claim had gone one throw away step too far, on a technology that could have covered SMS text messaging. Craige reveals the litigation and patent drafting mistakes made by both Intellectual Ventures and Motorola and what they could have done differently to change or improve their outcome. Did you know that just characterizing the prior art negatively could narrow your claim scope in a way you didn’t even mention in the patent? It’s true! Find out more in this episode.

Questions? If you would like to get your patent questions answered and be part of the show, Thompson Patent Law has a LIVE complimentary webinar called Ask The Patent Attorney. Call the number below and reserve your spot in this LIVE teaching event.

free Patent NEEDS Assessment

related articles

Software developer working on code at dual monitors in modern office.

LQP PatentCast: Electric Power Group LLC V. Alstom

✎Executive Summary1 min read Key Takeaways Software is patentable, but many software patent applications fail either during

Group of professionals discussing ideas on a whiteboard in a modern office.

LQP PatentCast: SIRF Technology V. The International Trade Commission

✎Executive Summary1 min read Key Takeaways Employees who conceive patentable ideas while working can walk away with

Close-up of microchip components on circuit board for patent law.

LQP PatentCast: Presidio Components, Inc., V. American Technical Ceramics

✎Executive Summary1 min read Key Takeaways Companies accused of patent infringement often have access to sophisticated defensive