LQ PatentCast: Mastermine Software V. Microsoft

Published

Category

Reading time

Author

Picture of Craige Thompson

Craige Thompson

Craige is an experienced engineer, accomplished patent attorney, and bestselling author.

Table of contents

Share

Summary: The 4 layers that must be considered to properly interpret a patent claim.

In this enlightening review of Microsoft’s successful non-infringement defense against Mastermine’s software patent relating to pivot tables, Craige exposes the 4 layers that must be considered to properly interpret a patent claim.

Craige provides crucial insights into the subtleties of each layer that make the difference between successful patent enforcement and just getting close but falling short, as Mastermine did with their claims.

As a bonus, Craige takes this case as a rare opportunity to explore hybrid claiming techniques, showing the factors that courts look at to decide when to permit both method and apparatus elements to be recited in the same claim – which can produce very powerful claims, for example, to protect software!

In the Special Software Series, Craige Thompson discusses recent software patent decisions. If you would like to know what works and what doesn’t work since the Alice decision we invite you to listen to the show. Check back for new additions to this series.

free
Patent Assessment

related articles

LQP PatentCast: Electric Power Group LLC V. Alstom

Summary: Patenting Software: Red Flags to Check For Software is patentable – we do it here at

LQP PatentCast: SIRF Technology V. The International Trade Commission

Summary: What would happen if your top engineers walked out the door with a patentable idea? As

LQP PatentCast: Presidio Components, Inc., V. American Technical Ceramics

Summary: Fending Off A Patent Businesses accused of patent infringement have some sophisticated strategies at their command.