Learn

Innovation Hub

Patent Prosecution Highway: The Underused Fast Lane That Can Accelerate Patents

Most patent applicants wait years for examination across multiple countries, pay attorney fees for repetitive prosecution, and watch competitors potentially beat them..

Posts Category
Sort by

IPR PTABCast: Owens Corning V. Fast Felt Corporation

Summary: Greedy, Lazy Patents = Invalid Craige reviews a case study of obviousness by tracing how common

IPR PTABCast: General Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd V. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha

Summary: PTAB defends patent owner against serial IPR Attacks! Man Bites Dog! Shocking news! It’s not every

IPR PTABCast: Aqua Products V. PTO

Summary: Patent Owners Can Breathe (A Little) Easier. In IPR (inter partes review), a patent is being

IPR PTABCast: Energy Heating V. Heat On-The-Fly

Summary: A case study about how NOT to try to use patents. Disaster befalls a patent owner

IPR PTABCast: IN RE: Power Integrations

Summary: Did the word “couple” really need to be interpreted twice by the PTO, twice by the

IPR PTABCast: Southwire V Cerro Wire

Summary: How to defeat rejection based on “inherency” Patent claims can be invalid if a prior art

IPR PTABCast: Ultratec V. Captioncall

Summary: A 44 Million Dollar award to a patent owner, Ultratec was wiped away by the Patent

LQP PatentCast: Electric Power Group LLC V. Alstom

Summary: Patenting Software: Red Flags to Check For Software is patentable – we do it here at

LQP PatentCast: SIRF Technology V. The International Trade Commission

Summary: What would happen if your top engineers walked out the door with a patentable idea? As

view our resources library to learn more 
about patents