{"id":851,"date":"2021-04-05T12:08:20","date_gmt":"2021-04-05T12:08:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/?p=851"},"modified":"2022-07-25T07:24:22","modified_gmt":"2022-07-25T07:24:22","slug":"tpl-blog-patents-ptab","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/tpl-blog-patents-ptab\/","title":{"rendered":"IPR PTAB CAST"},"content":{"rendered":"

IPR PTAB CAST<\/h2>\n

The IPR PTAB Cast, hosted by Craige Thompson (a.k.a., \u201cThe Examiner Whisperer\u201d) in this show we explore cutting edge and significant inter partes review (IPR) cases that come through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). IPRs are a hot topic because patent litigation frequently jumps from the federal courts back to the Patent Office. The relatively young IPR process has had a game-changing impact on patent valuation, enforcement, and litigation, so it warrants serious attention for anyone interested in winning the patent game.<\/p>\n

SIRF TECHNOLOGY V. THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION<\/h2>\n