{"id":830,"date":"2021-03-13T11:25:31","date_gmt":"2021-03-13T11:25:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/?p=830"},"modified":"2022-08-04T07:33:49","modified_gmt":"2022-08-04T07:33:49","slug":"tpl-blog-patents-ptab-southwire-v-cerro","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/tpl-blog-patents-ptab-southwire-v-cerro\/","title":{"rendered":"IPR PTABCast: Southwire V Cerro Wire"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"Podcast\"><iframe style=\"border: none;\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/6486500\/height\/360\/width\/640\/theme\/standard\/autonext\/no\/thumbnail\/yes\/autoplay\/no\/preload\/no\/no_addthis\/no\/direction\/backward\/\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>Summary: How to defeat rejection based on \u201cinherency&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Patent claims can be invalid if a prior art reference teaches almost all the claimed features and any missing features must \u201cnecessarily\u201d be present when you follow the Prior art teachings.<\/p>\n<p>In this IPR PTABCast Craige explains how Southwire\u2019s industry-changing process patent defeated the inherence attack but succumbed to the \u201cobviousness\u201d attack.<\/p>\n<p>Check out this further case study on obviousness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Questions?<\/strong> If you would like to get your patent questions answered and be part of the show, Thompson Patent Law has a LIVE complimentary webinar called https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/atpa-all-shows\/. Call the number below and reserve your spot in this LIVE teaching event.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Summary: How to defeat rejection based on \u201cinherency&#8221; Patent claims can be invalid if a prior art reference teaches almost all the claimed features and any missing features must \u201cnecessarily\u201d be present when you follow the Prior art teachings. In this IPR PTABCast Craige explains how Southwire\u2019s industry-changing process patent defeated the inherence attack but [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":1563,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ipr-ptabcast"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=830"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":831,"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830\/revisions\/831"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1563"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thompsonpatentlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}